What's New
   
 About Us
Background & History
Goals
Organizational Structure
Lead Agency
Steering Committee
Funder's Circle
Work Groups
 
 Ethnic Physician
 Organizations
Listing
Directory of Officers
Descriptions
Map
 
 Summit Materials
November 2005 Summit, San Mateo
October 2004 Summit, San Diego
October 2003 Summit, Oakland
April 2003 Summit, Glendale
2002 Summit, San Mateo
  
 Projects of the Network
Cancer Screening Project
Diabetes Health Disparities Convening Report
   
 Publications and Resources
   
 Calendar
   
   
 Links
   
 Contact Us
   
   

 

 

October 2003 Summit, Oakland
 
  Section 3: Sharing Knowledge, Building Capacity


D. Presentations and Updates

3. Carmen Nevarez, MD, MPH, Public Health Institute - Update on Proposition 54

Dr. Nevarez sounded a celebratory note at the Summit with her report on the defeat of Proposition 54 and the important role played by Ethnic Physician Organizations in moving the California Medical Association to actively oppose its passage. During their previous Summit in June 2003, the EPOs were unanimous in their view that the Proposition would have substantial negative health consequences for the communities they serve. That opposition was carried to the CMA's House of Delegates and was a significant factor in achieving CMA opposition to the measure.

Proposition 54 was the Ward Connerly initiative that would have banned collection, use and dissemination of data classified by race, ethnicity, color, or national origin by any local or state public institution in California. The coalition of civil rights, education, and health organizations opposing the Initiative were faced with an uphill struggle to defeat it. As recently as August 2003, only 36% of Californians opposed the Proposition and, due to the scheduling of the Gubernatorial recall election in October, the campaign had only eight weeks to turn that around.

Yet the campaign to defeat Proposition 54 was a resounding success with the measure losing in every county except Orange. Dr. Nevarez outlined the keys to this successful effort. Of major importance was the ability of the opposition campaign to gather sufficient contributions to reach the public through mass media. However, without the right message, the media campaign would not have turned public opinion in California.

The coalition of organizations opposing Proposition 54 learned through polling and focus groups that the message that resonated most with California voters was that the Proposition would have a negative impact on health care. As a result, media efforts focused on communicating that message. In order for this strategy to be effective, the education and civil rights members of the coalition agreed to let the health message lead even though the Proposition would also have had major implications for the quality of schools and the protection of rights of minorities.

Enlisting the California Medical Association in the opposition to Proposition 54 was a critical element of the success of the campaign. The ability to list physicians, along with nurses and other health professionals, as opponents to the measure enhanced the credibility of the claim that it would be harmful to the health of Californians

 

 

© 2004 CMA Foundation All Rights Reserved
Questions/Comments Click Here.
Site Engineered by Andrew Felicetti